NORTH WESTERN AND NORTH WALES SEA FISHERIES COMMITTEE

 

OFFICER’S REPORT

 

Fishery orders

 

Report by the Chief Executive

 

Purpose of Report

This report reconsiders the potential benefits of a new Regulating Order for the cockle and mussel fisheries of Morecambe Bay. It proposes a means by which work on such an Order could be recommenced in tandem with the renewal of three current Fishery Orders within the District which expire in 2008.

 

Recommendation

That the Committee endorses the potential benefits of a new Morecambe Bay Cockle and Mussel Fishery Regulating Order

That the Committee agrees to include responsibility for Fishery Orders within the job plan of the new Fishery Officer

1. Background

1.1 Fishery Orders are statutory instruments (SI) made by Parliament under the Sea Fisheries (Shellfish) Act 1967. These Orders enable the Committee, as Grantee, to actively manage the shellfisheries sustainably and economically. Fishery Orders provide for some of the most productive and sustainable shellfisheries of our District. They have effect for a defined time period, usually 30 or 60 years although recently much shorter Orders have been enacted. When Orders expire, if not renewed, the controls such as leases and lays, together with the management and income benefits established under the Order cease to apply.

1.2 The work required to establish, or renew a Fishery Order is considerable and complex. The purpose of the Order, and the Order itself must be drafted, taking into account the views and interests of all stakeholders including all the regulators, landowners and the users of the area from the fishing and other sectors. A management plan of the area to be regulated has to be prepared, also taking into account views of the other authorities and for a ‘Special Area of Conservation’, (such as Morecambe Bay) it is likely that an extensive 'Appropriate Assessment' would have to be agreed with the Conservation Agency. Government approval for the Order is required to provide the necessary act of parliament and a public inquiry to address stakeholder concerns and objections is probable.

1.3 The Committee has done extensive background study of the feasibility and potential benefits of a Regulating Fishery Order for Morecambe Bay over the past 10 years. The estimated cost and complexity of setting up such an Order was seen as a barrier to progress. Government signals of new legislation for inshore fishery management have up to now, suggested that the large amount of work required to develop an Order might not be appropriate at this time.

1.4 However the political climate in Morecambe Bay has changed since 2004. The changing nature of modern shellfisheries with large number of fishers operating internationally and the increased pressure on the Morecambe Bay area from the fishery, have led to renewed calls for an improved management regime. In the absence of a commitment from Government for new national legislation in the short term, it is necessary to reconsider a Regulating Order for Morecambe Bay.

1.5 In addition to the Morecambe Bay issue, in 2008-9, three existing Fishery Orders within our District are scheduled to expire. These are

(a) The Conwy Estuary Mussel Fishery Regulating Order 1948.

(b) The Menai Strait (West) Oyster, Mussel and Clam Fishery Order 1978

(c) The Morecambe Bay Mussel Fishery Regulating Order 1978

2. Morecambe Bay

2.1 The 1978 Mussel Fishery Order provides for management of seed mussel fishing in a small northern part of the Bay known as South America Skear. It will expire on 18 January 2009. At the very least, this Order should be renewed in its present form to maintain the benefits it brings for mussel growing and wild stock in the district.

2.2 There is now a strong argument for a much larger scale Regulating Order covering all or as much as possible of the cockle and mussel fisheries of Morecambe Bay. The main fishery benefits that such an Order would be expected to bring are that shellfish gathering could be licensed, number of fishers could be limited according to defined criteria and fishers would have an incentive to manage the fisheries sustainably with a long term view. An important benefit for the Committee would be that the management costs of the fisheries could be recovered through the licence and/or lease charges.

3. Conwy Estuary Mussel Fishery Order

3.1 This 60 year Order was made in 1948 and will expire in 2008. It is a Regulating Order which enables the Committee to manage the mussel fisheries through a limited licensing scheme. There are at present 20, of a maximum allowed 22, licences. The Order licensing Sub-Committee will shortly discuss a change in one of the licence holders. A review group was established in 2004 to progress the renewal of this Order which has agreed the process required. The group has also quantified the substantial changes required to the Order's boundaries and management controls. However, resource constraints and the change in Chief Executive have meant that the group has not met recently and CEO regrets that the renewal is now behind the schedule proposed in the early meetings of the group.

4. Menai Strait (West) Oyster, Mussel and Clam Fishery Order 1978

4.1 The Menai Strait West Order is a Several Order which leases defined areas to shellfish growers to cultivate mussels, oysters and clams. It expires on 23 March 2008.

5. Prospects for progress

5.1 The previous Chief Executive reported in May 2005 that the resource cost to progress the renewal of Fishery Orders cannot be met within current staffing levels. The pressure on staff was confirmed in the 2005 Review of Establishment and the Committee has resolved to provide for an additional member of staff in the 2006-7 budget.

5.2 Officers have considered how best to use the additional capacity that this member of staff will provide. The CEO, PFO and SS have agreed that the Fishery Orders are of sufficient importance to warrant the inclusion of these tasks within the job plan of the new post. A member of staff with the designated role of Officer for Fishery Orders would give us the ongoing capacity to undertake the work required over the next 2-3 years to renew the Orders that are close to expiry and progress the establishment of a new, larger scale Order for Morecambe Bay. The post would essentially be a Fishery Officer post but unlike the present fishery officers it would not cover a defined part of the district. It would probably be based in the Lancaster Offices of the Committee and provide enhanced enforcement capacity throughout the District as required, alongside the Fishery Order work.

5.3 A single member of staff will not be expected to cover all the resources required to undertake the Fishery Order work as set out above. Additional resources, particularly for consultation and public inquiry are expected to be considerable. Some of the work will be chargeable to the accounts of the existing Fishery Orders and it may be necessary to raise the existing licence and lease fees. Other regulatory authorities, industries, stakeholders and local enterprise companies will also be approached for the additional funding required.

 

 

STEPHEN ATKINS

Chief Executive

16 January 2006

 

LOCAL GOVERNMENT (ACCESS TO INFORMATION) ACT, 1985

List of Background Papers

There are no background papers to this report.

Top